Spinal Tumor Radiofrequency Ablation For Pain Relief
While any patient with focalized pain from a metastatic spinal tumor may be a candidate for Radiofrequency Ablation, several specific patient groups will likely benefit most from the procedure.
These include patients…
- with radio-resistant tumors
- with recurrent pain after radiation therapy
- with posterior vertebral body metastatic tumors
- who have reached their maximum radiation dose limit
- with localized pain and symptoms that are preventing palliative radiation
- who cannot undergo other palliative treatments due to current systemic treatments
- in which myelosuppression is of concern
A desirable combination of therapeutic advantages for our patients
Focus on treatment of primary cancer
By quickly addressing painful metastatic disease, targeted Radiofrequency Ablation(t-RFA) allows patients to concentrate on primary cancer treatments.
Rapid Pain Relief
Targeted Radiofrequency Ablation enables a single, minimally invasive procedure that can provide rapid, durable pain relief and localized tumor destruction.
Targeted Radiofrequency Ablation is non-toxic, thereby allowing patients to continue their current systemic treatment uninterrupted.
Targeted Radiofrequency Ablation offers a treatment path for patients with limited options, including those with radio-resistant tumors or who have reached their radiation dose limits.
Meaningful Clinical Outcomes
Metastatic spinal tumors are neoplasms located in the vertebrae that are commonly associated with a wide range of primary cancers, from breast, lung, and prostate to sarcomas, carcinomas, and hematological diseases. Tumors are commonly classified according to their location, whether it be intradural (intramedullary or extramedullary) or extradural. Extradural lesions, those occurring outside of the dura mater of the spinal cord, account for 95% of spinal lesions, the vast majority of these originating from the vertebrae.1
Metastatic spinal tumors, depending on their location, can have debilitating consequences with significant impact on the activities of daily living. Patients living with such tumors may experience increasing pain with common transitions such as rising from a chair or lying in a resting position. These tumors can ultimately impinge on the spinal cord and nerve roots, leading to numbness and, potentially, paralysis in areas throughout the body. Metastatic spinal tumors can also weaken the structure of the vertebrae, leading to vertebral compression fractures, which often present with acute back pain.
Metastatic disease in the skeleton occurs in up to 85% of late-stage patients with the three most common types of cancer – breast, prostate and lung 2 – with the spine being the most common site of occurrence. [Spinal meningioma is acute among bone metastases, accounting for roughly 25% of all spinal tumors.3] Studies show that between 10% and 40% of all cancer patients will develop metastatic spinal tumors, with even higher rates in elderly patients.4 Several post-mortem studies have found metastatic spinal tumors in more than 30% of all patients who died as a result of cancer and cancer-related comorbidities.7
When metastatic spinal tumors are discovered, the metastatic disease is often found to be affecting multiple levels of the spine and causing tumor growth in each affected vertebrae.
With over 1.5 million new cancer cases diagnosed in the United States annually, metastatic spinal tumors are believed to affect over 150,000 patients every year.
Patient Quality of Life
There is increasing evidence that survival is linked to symptom control and that pain management contributes to broad quality-of-life improvement. To maximize patient outcomes, pain management is an essential part of oncologic management.7
Patients often present with acute back pain and, depending on the location of the metastatic spinal tumors, numbness in the legs, buttocks, and other areas. When the pain becomes overwhelming, systemic treatment of the primary cancer may be halted in order to begin other palliative therapies with the aim of addressing the metastatic spinal tumors and its associated pain and mitigate risks associated with cumulative toxicity of some therapies.
While most cancer treatments focus on the eradication of the neoplasm, the endpoints in treating painful metastatic spinal tumors are often maximum pain relief and minimum delay in treatment of the primary cancer. Treatment regimens that can balance these two needs are attractive complements to current standards of care.
- Bartels R, van der Linden Y, and van der Graaf W. Spinal Extradural Metastasis: Review of Current Treatment Options. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 58:245-259
- Kurup AN, Callstrom MR. Ablation of skeletal metastases: Current status. J VascInterv Radiol. 2010 21:S242-S250
- Arnautovic K, Arnautovic A. Extramedullaryintradural spinal tumors: a review of modern diagnostic and treatment options and a report of a series. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009 9 Suppl 1:40-45
- Cardoso ER, Ashamalla H, Weng L, Mokhtar B, Ali S, Macedon M, and Guirguis A. Percutaneous tumor curettage and interstitial delivery of samarium-153 coupled with kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral metastases. J Neurosurg: Spine. 2009 10:336-342
- Wong DA, Fornasier VL, and MacNab I. Spinal metastases: the obvious, the occult, and the impostors. Spine. 1990 15(1):1-4
- Ortiz Gómez JA. The incidence of vertebral body metastases. IntOrthop. 1995 19:309-311 PubMed: 8567140
- Principles of Cancer Pain. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2014 Version 2: Original Source